Snow Depth Mapping Accuracy with Lidar Drones

March 27, 2021
|

2 min read

results of Snow Depth Mapping with Drone Lidar
Terrestrial and airborne laser scanning and structure from motion techniques have emerged as viable methods to perform snow depth mapping. While these systems have advanced snow hydrology, these techniques have noted limitations in either horizontal or vertical resolution.

From a research report by Jennifer M. Jacobs, et al.

Lidar on an unpiloted aerial vehicle (UAV) is another potential method to observe field- and slope-scale variations at the vertical resolutions needed to resolve local variations in snowpack depth and to quantify snow depth when snowpacks are shallow.

This paper provides some of the earliest snow depth mapping results on the landscape scale that were measured using lidar on a UAV. The system, which uses modest-cost, commercially available components, was assessed in a mixed deciduous and coniferous forest and open field for a thin snowpack (< 20 cm). The lidar-classified point clouds had an average of 90 and 364 points/m2 ground returns in the forest and field, respectively. In the field, in situ and lidar mean snow depths, at 0.4 m horizontal resolution, had a mean absolute difference of 0.96 cm and a root mean square error of 1.22 cm. At 1 m horizontal resolution, the field snow depth confidence intervals were consistently less than 1 cm. The forest areas had reduced performance with a mean absolute difference of 9.6 cm, a root mean square error of 10.5 cm, and an average one-sided confidence interval of 3.5 cm.

Although the mean lidar snow depths were only 10.3 cm in the field and 6.0 cm in the forest, a pairwise Steel–Dwass test showed that snow depths were significantly different between the coniferous forest, the deciduous forest, and the field land covers (p < 0.0001).

Snow depths were shallower, and snow depth confidence intervals were higher in areas with steep slopes. Results of this study suggest that performance depends on both the point cloud density, which can be increased or decreased by modifying the flight plan over different vegetation types, and the grid cell variability that depends on site surface conditions.

For the complete paper on snow depth mapping CLICK HERE.

Get Lidar News in Your Inbox

Weekly updates on lidar tech, geospatial industry news, case studies, and product reviews.

About The Author

Gene Roe - founder of Lidar News

Phoenix Lidar System - complete lidar solutions
SAM Managed geospatial services

Recent Drones Posts

Autonomous UAV Collision Detection

Autonomous UAV Collision Detection Mining is an industry made up…

February 1, 2026

Velodyne Space to Showcase Counter-UAS System at CES 2026

Velodyne Space to Showcase Counter-UAS System at CES 2026 David…

January 27, 2026

David S. Hall Announces Cam-Lidar Technology For Drone Defense

David S. Hall Announces Cam-Lidar Technology For Drone Defense Revolutionary…

November 10, 2025

Commercial UAV Expo 2025 Highlights

Commercial UAV Expo 2025 Highlights: BVLOS Rulemaking and Drone Industry…

September 8, 2025

Freefly Fest Highlights: Drones, Lidar, and New Products

Written by Adam Clark. Adam has spent the past 13…

August 28, 2025

Frontier Precision Announces Acquisition of Tenacity Ag

Frontier Precision Announces Acquisition of Tenacity Ag Frontier Precision is…

August 26, 2025

Popular Posts

3DSurvey - more than just photogrammetry software

Get Lidar News in Your Inbox

Weekly updates on lidar tech, geospatial industry news, case studies, and product reviews.

New Compass Ranger asset extraction